May 7, 2018

I will echo the positive review by Alison about A Quiet Place. I will say that her review noting that she jumped a couple of times prepared me and I was not really startled – in the back of my mind I am thinking “this seems like a pretty good spot for a jump to occur”. Anyway this film is pleasantly NOT a horror film nor a gross out, like a Friday 13th, or Nightmare of Elm Street, Saw etc. Instead it is a thriller about a family set in the future after some extraterrestrial incident. It’s a movie where you feel exhausted from clenching your stomach muscles tightly for 1.5 hours. It takes ordinary actions and situations, and let’s you realize how difficult they all would be if they had to be done silently. But it also explores the dynamics of a young family and surviving through difficult times. I really enjoyed this.

On Netflix, besides getting caught up in the Monty Python wave that has come to it with interviews and old shows and then the movies (Holy Grail and Life of Brian are just priceless) – last night I watched a new documentary entitled End Game. It documents the stories of a few people of varying ages in San Francisco area hospitals and hospices. They are all dying and soon. They have doctors, nurses and other people there to assist in this process. It is very emotional as you see a Mother and husband grapple with a Wife/daughter who has cancer and there is nothing more that can be done for her. It shows to me that I want to be crystal clear with those around me on my end of days wishes and intentions for me. I don’t want to see people already under stress wondering and worry about “what would Robbie have wanted to be done at this stage?”. No. They will be able to provide their own filter and thoughts on their own feelings, but knowing what I want, will be clearly known. I found that the doctor who had his own story to not be very helpful in some aspects, I’ll let you make your own choice if you choose to watch this. TIFF film Euphoria addressed some of these issues. Here it is in the US, and we have reality entering into the lives of all these people, when clearly they would rather it not be the case. Still – good to watch, but not easy.

April 23rd, 2018

Loving Vincent – animated, and nominated for Best Animated Feature. This one is recently added to Netflix and its claim to fame really is the use of hundreds of artists who made real paintings used in the film. It took years for the pictures to be painted, and this film is remarkable in showing the Van Gogh masterpieces set within a fictional story. The fictional story is a letter that is addressed from Vincent to his brother. The Van Gogh brothers exchanged many letters over the years. The story here is not significant. But rather the visual splendor that is Van Gogh paintings and how they weave their way through the film. There are actors here, and those you will know from Peaky Blinders and Game of Thrones and Saiorse Ronan too. They provide voices, but are animated in a way and style that shows who they are. The black and white flashbacks too a lot like the technology for the animated music video Take On Me. Full disclosure, I like Van Gogh paintings, and I have been to the Van Gogh museum in Amsterdam. I have also seen his works in Chicago and Paris and other cities. It is remarkable to me that this troubled soul did not sell a painting during his lifetime (this is a debatable fact, but the number would be minuscule), and his brother had the foresight and means to recognize his talent and unique gift. Here is yet another genius (like Mozart) who left the world too early, but made a last impression that is still felt today.

For those who are interested in how this was made, see this YouTube on it:

Kodachrome – is recently released on Netflix as well and stars Ed Harris, Jason Sudeikis and Elizabeth Olsen. This is a well worn story about a dying man seeking out estranged children to head out on a road to do or find something. A couple years back it was Nebraska with Bruce Dern. This is formulaic and so the value in watching is really on the performances. Here Harris plays the dying well-known photographer/journalist who was a lousy husband and father but was known for his pictures/images. He insists that his pictures be put on celluloid and there is one Kodak location left in Parsons KS that can develop his film, some film that he had taken many years before. The rest unfolds predictably but it still has some emotional impact. The music includes Pearl Jam and the band Live which is discussed at length. The Paul Simon song, ironically enough, is NOT included here. Still worth a look, and make sure you are prepared for emotional side in the fourth act.

April 16th, 2018

Two films were reviewed this week and both were on Netflix.

First I watched The Florida Project which had my attention because Willem Dafoe was nominated as a Best Supporting Actor in his role. This is a simple story about a budget motel outside Disney grounds in Orlando. There are a group of characters at the motel, along with some single parents and all are women, mostly tattooed up here there and everywhere. The children run around with little oversight and are generally obnoxious. Dafoe plays the Office Manager and fix-it-guy who is responsible for the property and maintaining peace. He can nip problems in the bud, or prevent things that may happen. He also watches and sees what his customers are doing. He gets more in his job than he bargains for, especially with the children. I don’t see the Nomination quite frankly for him. Yes he was decent, but there are other roles to me that are more crucial and add more value for the lead roles. In the end this is a tale of poor circumstance and poor choices with adults who shape the lives of these children, and yet have no real direction for themselves.

The other film was one I thought I heard rumblings about at TIFF. Killing of the Sacred Deer, is a modern day telling of a Greek fable. There is reference to which Greek fable in the film, but that really is not all that important. I did not know that going in (and I puzzled over the title of the film to begin with). This is a story by the same director as The Lobster. I like this one more and it is more impactful. Colin Ferrell stars once again, and does a really good job, along with Nicole Kidman, and the children who play their kids. Add to that another young man who is a central part of the story. There is dialogue here between the parties involved that is polite, but not quite normal communication. It’s stilted and truncated almost. It gave me the impression of it being more like a fable. Farrell plays a heart surgeon and he has his wife (Kidman) an opthamalogist, and two kids. We are introduced to a young man that Farrell has seemed to befriend. The story then unfolds in ways that I did not anticipate nor will I share at this point. The Ebert review I think went too far in describing the plot and I won’t duplicate the mistake. To me, this film is best seen as it unfolds. Quite honestly my reaction to it was “wow”. It goes from being somewhat slow and unsure of itself to then gaining some momentum to where there is such tension and thrill as to where it will go next, that it will stay with you for some time afterwards. Without a doubt this is a TIFF film. But also it would be one where I am glad that I was able to see it and reflect upon it. Happy to have discussions later if others have had a chance to view.

April 9th, 2018

Two reviews for this week are small screen reviews (I didn’t make it out to the theatre).

First was on the plane I watched Battle of the Sexes, the TIFF film from a year ago starring Steve Carrell as self-proclaimed male chauvinist pig, and facially challenged Best Actor winner from a year ago Emma Stone. Interestingly I think as she is made up to look like a younger Billie Jean King, that her face isn’t so obviously a jumbled mess. I was very young when this whole Battle of the Sexes tennis battle took place (Sept 20 1973). I however knew nothing of the Riggs match with women’s Number 1 Margaret Court. She was beaten handily. In steps King. You would think that this is the focus of the movie. But it’s only scratching the surface, as the movie deals with Riggs and his motivations (gambling problem, and a desk job that cannot match the excitement of his previous spotlight life) and also the early days of King realizing despite being married that chicks are her thing. So the Battle of the Sexes can be about repressed leanings and having to show well for the public (who aren’t ready for what we take for granted each day in 2018). This isn’t a great film, but it highlights the issues well, and gives a sense of the 1970s. King’s then husband clearly shows that he knew what she was all about. He is likely more understanding than one could expect. Carrell to me is better than Stone, but then again I am not really a Stone fan as we all know. Worth checking out, and the price was right (zero) for me.

Next was Netflix had on Hanna, a 2011 film with Saoirse Ronan back in her teens and Cate Blanchett and Eric Bana. Bana had done Munich, Star Trek and Time Traveller’s Wife here, and Blanchett was a rising star. I like all the actors here, and notably the females. Ronan keeps getting better and better and I wanted to see an earlier work of hers. Here is a challenge and she embodies it very well. An isolated teen with her father in the woods, hunting and living off the land. She is multi-lingual and highly skilled in combat. We learn he was an agent of note, but now isolated with her. The plot unfolds and the girl learns about her isolation and her intense training. Father and daughter are split and are pursued. Tom Hollander is the real find here a the bad guy, and does his creepy best to add tension. I liked this film, and feel all made this a story good on a number of levels (thinking about family, and threats both perceived and real, and the ends justifying the means).

April 2nd, 2018

Welcome to April – first quarter of the year is already finished, scarily enough.

Thursday night we went to see Ready Player One with two teen boys. This is the virtual reality movie with Steven Spielberg at the helm. It is from the book released in 2011 by Ernest Cline, unread by me, but devoured by girlfriend’s son in one sitting.

This is a Charlie and the Chocolate Factory-like storyline with a virtual reality world that people are playing globally in the future (2044). People live in shacks and their lives are not very exciting, and so they play in this world, called Oasis, created by these two Jobs/Gates like guys. The one creator played by geeky and awkward Mark Rylance, in yet another quality performance from him, has him note that he has hidden three keys in Oasis, and the person who can find them gets an Easter Egg and more importantly control of the entire thing, and it’s value (in trillions). To date no one has found any keys, although the race to find the first one finds many potential takers. Our story continues, with the mighty corporation trying mightily and then an unknown street rat from Ohio, living in a raised mobile home. Who will find the first key? What does this have to say about our society? Since the Rylance character grew up in the 80s, there are plenty of references here back to the time. Cars, movies, sayings, Atari games all come back – and the younger members of the audience won’t get all of these, and it won’t make much difference. In the end there is a message, and commentary on the direction of where we are all going. This had some moments of fun. The CGI is good as it meshes with the real people. I liked Rylance and the TJ Miller characters the best. It is better on the big screen, although I didn’t find the 3D compelling – it rarely is.

March 26, 2018

On Netflix, I have been catching up with some documentaries and watching in more committed fashion the legal drama Suits.

The documentary that was interesting was John Mellancamp’s Plain Spoken. There is a concert from Chicago with him doing a voiceover with his life story and just stories for him. I had never realized that he had spina bifida. He was surgically worked on with three other babies at the time, and the only one to have survived.

Another documentary was the Leo DiCaprio Before the Flood, that as a Global Warming film that was not all that compelling. I found that those who speak about ice and coral are far more able to make one feel action is paramount (see Chasing Coral and Chasing Ice). Here we talk about a “turning point” being Paris Accord from 2015. Well, Mr Trump isn’t signing and there appears little political will in the US to move forward. The disturbing aspect of this are countries like India and China who look to the US to take the lead. In truth China has progressed better with solar. But still. Don’t look for any leadership for the time being.

On the plane I started watching IT. I think IT needs to be on a bigger screen to get the jumps that IT wants to illicit. I can see how IT creeps some people out, but for me, IT just doesn’t or didn’t do IT. IT was very popular in the theatres which would suggest that IT and others will follow. I was glad that I did not pay for IT. Also glad that I won’t be seeking out the end of IT which I didn’t manage to see.

I also enjoyed the documentary about the Men behind the Apollo missions in the Control Center. There were real faces of people that Ron Howard used in Apollo 13, like vested Ed Harris as Mission Control. It is an exciting time to be looking forward with NASA and the missions ahead to Mars, and more closely the new rocket to orbit around the moon once again. This younger generation may remember some Space Shuttle launches, but this will be something more exciting. The US getting back in space exploration after paying the Russians for travel up to the International Space Station. Exciting!

I was re-watching The Right Stuff which still holds it’s own in showing the Mercury program and those astronauts. There is Chuck Yeager breaking the sound barrier. Then breaking twice the barrier just a few years later.

This week ahead is Steven Spielberg’s new Ready Player One. We’ll see how the boys will like that.

March 19, 2018

This past week was spent in Florida, but on the way there I had a chance to watch Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets. In truth, this was watched over a couple of trips. And in both cases, it really didn’t come together and make much sense. The relationship aspect with two agents where he had proposed earlier didn’t work with two people with zero chemistry. Not sure whether that was a “her” or a “him” issue, since they both have their challenges; he is delivering dialogue in his best Keanu Reaves imitation with no inflection, while she just doesn’t seem to give a shit about anything, but with a smirk on her face. The three little annoying aardvark-like creatures were looking to be like the trader in early Star Wars (Ani’s boss). In the end, right up to including when Rhinanna shows up it is a mess, with a strange story and less interesting characters. Did I for a minute think Clive Owen was in any way a good guy? Ummmm no. Incidentally Roger Ebert site gave this a 4 Star rating.

I also watched I Tonya, and there is a part of me that wonders about who is getting paid and how much for this story. Credits seem to indicate we have cooperation from Jeff Gillooly and also with Tonya Harding herself, who isn’t afraid of doing anything necessary to make a buck (like box in Celebrity Bouts). What they provide, as initially advertised, is the self-serving perspective of each of the characters. As they say, truth is one’s perspective on the facts. This is shown in spades here, and quite humourously as well. People know the story from the tabloids, and the Olympics from Albertville and then Lillehammer just two years later. There is the equally well known Incident, where competitor Nancy Kerrigan has her leg whacked after a practice session. Allison Janney deserved full marks for her performance as the scene stealing Mom of Tonya. A chain-smoking, profane, waitress from Nowhere Oregon with a chip on her shoulder and attitude to burn. She is steadfast in her pushing and abuse of her daughter from early age. Tonya may want to come off as a victim, but all the “it’s not my fault” aspects of this don’t resonate. The overall sentence given out for the Incident to her, also shows that others don’t believe her nor her explanation of what she knew and when. But this was an entertaining film. I was astounded at the level of stupidity of the people that surrounded her, and especially the bodyguard. Gillooly tries to portray himself as a “good guy” whil denying the fact that he physically abused Harding. I guess all the restraining orders that should be public record also lie about the “good guy” as well. But in the end, it was Janney who was the most entertaining, even in the film itself when she pointed out that she had been ignored for too long with her storyline.

March 5th, 2018 – Post Oscars

First off, The Shape of Water was not the best film of 2017. It just wasn’t. But this is becoming a familiar pattern with the Academy it seems and political considerations likely are at work more than they should be for deciding on which was the best film of the year.

For me, this year was Dunkirk’s year with Three Bllboards in a close second. Three Billboards is a very American-centric fim, but the writing and performances across the board were excellent. It likely loses votes from non-US Academy members. Dunkirk isn’t a US film at all – it is about a British and French event before the US was involved. It is the turning point in the Second World War. The companion piece, just as exhilarating is Darkest Hour with Gary Oldman playing Winston. They are both set in May 1940. Together they portray the days brilliantly. I will say more about the Oscars later. I tip my cap to Alison who wins the pool for the second straight year. Well done, and picking Shape of Water as Best Picture. That and Get Out for screenplay quite simply just shocked me.

On Friday I went out and saw my second last remaining Best Picture nomination with Phantom Thread. It stays with me still. It is a period piece around 1950ish, but no specific period. It revolves the story of three main protagonists. He (Daniel Day Lewis) an older, persnickety clothing maker perfectionist and then his colleague sister and then his latest muse, who he found while eating breakfast by the sea as she served him his substantial meal. Together they buzz around in initially common ways and then more unique and strange ways. The acting by each (two of the three – sister and man) got Oscar nods. The third likely deserved one for supporting rather than Mary J Blige (but I digress). This is a dysfunctional lot, with those surrounding the male lead as enablers and also challengers at times. I was shaken and confused by the ending and the whole scenario as it played out, but it is a film that can’t win a Best Picture. It is just too “British”, I think. American audiences just don’t have the patience for it. In the end it can be seen on Netflix and be just as satisfying. We saw in 70mm, and even received the companion catalog of pictures as a bonus. Honestly, I need to see Dunkirk in 70mm (and I did) but not this.

For Documentaries I saw Icarus on Saturday night. It swayed my vote away from Abacus: Small Enough to Jail. In it, there is the tale of an athlete trying to showing the prevalence of doping in cycling, but going so far as doping himself and trying to defeat the tests. But it makes a turn as the Russian Director who ended up assisting him gets into political hot water as they Sochi Olympic scandal meltdown occurred. The Director was the main facilitator keeping the State-sponsored program of doping secret. He left in exile for the US. He is a wanted man in Russia. This real life spy caper is very interesting and shows just how far the Russian government was prepared to go to succeed in Sochi. It makes you wonder what they are doing for the World Cup in June!! According to this documentary, the Russians have never ceased using steroids. Period.

February 28th, 2018 follow up

Here is a follow on discussion to Alison seeing Annihilation in a theatre with people insisting on talking through it.

My post: It astounds me time and again the theatre etiquette of many of the movie going public. They are all the clichés as expressed in the Cineplex cartoons, notably many Suzy Soundtracks. And this isn’t limited to the young and obnoxious. Girlfriend and I sat behind an older couple who just couldn’t manage to cease the endless chatter. Girlfriend when she saw Black Panther actually told someone to STFU. Perhaps we are too conditioned with large screens at home to be able to talk loudly and multi-task through a film in a cinema. Perhaps it’s more about the increasingly insular and non-public lives that we lead which contributes to this lack of basic understanding of how to act in a crowd. It’s infuriating, and takes away from the enjoyment of the film. And some films are actually better if you can see them with an audience, like comedies and scary films. But it’s less so with these common issues.

When I went last Thursday night it was a 90% full theatre for a 7:30 showing. The reaction of those leaving was some in bewilderment, others seemingly chatting away. So how did you like the film, if at all?

I watched Huntsman: Winter’s Watch on dvd which you would think with two of my more favourite actresses (Jessica and Emily Blunt) that I would like it better. I didn’t. Quite simply this is a mess, and trying to put together a pre-story for Snow White, but then also a post-story, the nasty Queen (Charlize Theron) is dead but is she really?! Altogether there is just a little too much Chris Hemsworth in films these days. The guy seems to be everywhere, and nowhere is he outstanding. Full review to come next Monday.

I also watched Dirty Money with VW episode, which really puts VW in a bad light, although it takes pot shots at the entire German car making industry. This involves the scandal on software blockers for NOX emissions on diesel engines. The real truth is that diesel is not clean, and that no one has ever been able to get an affordable diesel engine to market that is compliant with US standards. But boy, they played the Hitler card here early, and then talked later about proposing humans and then apes for emissions harm tests (“Germans have a history of using gas…”) and a do-what-the-boss-says-for-sales culture that ignores “killing” human beings, which for me takes it a little bit too far. I don’t see an uproar in China with 1.5 Billion people, and who still uses coal for factories and has smog days in Beijing which are blinding with such emissions. But it’s worth a look.

More to come. Sorry about your movie experience.

February 26th, 2018

With the end of the Olympics, then there comes a time to get back to some movie viewing.

I will be sending out the officepools.com Academy Awards selections for this year as well for those who are interested. Quite honestly I don’t think that there will be much drama at all at this years Oscars. At every major award so far (Golden Globe, BAFTA, SAG) the same names keep popping up.

Anyway, this weekend I saw Annihilation. This is a not very well publicized movie starring Natalie Portman and Oscar Isaac. It bombed at the box office but as the attached article will attest, that doesn’t necessarily mean that it is bad movie or not worthy of your dollars. In fact, I would argue that it is a good movie, and EXACTLY the type of movie that if you love film should go and see. Why? Because it’s different. Because it has a premise that pushes the viewer to bring their own life experiences to the forefront to have it impact them personally. It won’t impact all people the same way.

The director here is Alex Garland, who directed Ex Machina and 28 Days Later, and shares a futuristic world, set in some reality. In this story, the future world is impacted by a meteor that hits a lighthouse that looks like it’s from Maine. There a multicoloured wall emanates and grows larger and keeps growing out. Efforts to understand the wall and what happens inside it, are fruitless. A team of all women choose to go behind the wall and investigate, and then things happen and the story unfolds. And unfolding and layering is what happens here. The viewer is thrust into the middle of something and then is provided with pieces along the way to have it make more sense. There are strong visuals, and some good scary bits. One scene in particular is just plain shocking.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2018/02/26/annihilations-grim-box-office-fate-was-an-inevitable-tragedy/#798dc1c04ed9

One of the challenges for this movie is the direct-to-Netflix (International) decision of Paramount. Obviously the international box office will suffer as a result. But it’s sad that a unique and original film takes a back seat to any number of super heroes and reboots of other tales. There are parallels to other films from before, and I will happily discuss these once Alison has seen the film. No spoilers. But in the end, I decided to see this without much review or fanfare. I didn’t look at trailers and decided to avoid the Ebert review except to see the 3 ½ star overview.

I have thought about it some more since I saw on Thursday, although I am still on the fence about whether I would need to re-see this or watch again like an Arrival to get more out of it. Likely I would as one focuses on different things than just plot when seeing a second time. Further discussion to be made on this one.

On tap are a few library films: The Accountant and The Huntsman Winter’s War. I also picked up Elizabeth once again to see how badly Cate Blanchett was robbed of an Oscar for that performance by Gwyneth (ugh). So many supporting cast members is that film from 20 years ago (like Daniel Craig, Emily Mortimer, Lily Allen etc) have gone on to amazing careers. 1998 – feeling old yet?!