Lee: Any film that has Kate Winslet, Marion Cotillard, and Alexander Skarsgard is worthy of some attention. This movie is the life story of model and war-time photographer American Lee Miller. Miller led a fascinating and full time, which I think viewers in 2024 should view with an understanding of her times (late 30s and into war-time 1940s). These are not exactly times where women are viewed as anywhere near equal and capable, while ironically the women were expected to contribute to the war effort in previously held positions solely of men (like in factories, munitions, mining etc.). Before the war begins, Lee Miller is living in France with her bohemian friends discussing politics and how it isn’t possible for the German to be electing the despot Adolph Hitler. They believe as they sit topless outside, sipping wine and enjoying the bounty of a life of freedom in late 30s Europe. By happenstance at this gathering, she meets a handsome Brit, Roland Penrose, played by Skargard, who was an historian, art collector and supporter of those against the growing German power, and by definition the independent French. They become romantically linked.

Miller was a former successful model, we learn, who later decided to get behind the camera. She had some very good skills. We explore more of the story through the lens of a discussion with a young man in her living room. Miller is at this stage much older, drinking more heavily and still an avid smoker. Her older pictures have been found by the young man and he would like to know the stories behind them.

Winslet admirable plays this woman who for her time was a force of nature. She would not take No for an answer. Her experience as a model leads her into a role at the British Vogue magazine where she is blessed with a supportive and forward-thinking editor and boss. Miller hears how photographers are being solicited to travel to mainland Europe as the build up continues and the inevitable invasion into France. Miller wants to be there. The British refuse. She finds a way around that and becomes an on-the-ground photographer first relegated to pictures of medics on the back end of the battle but moving closer to the front lines. She depicts scenes in war that show time and again the atrocities involved. As the war is nearing the close, she finds what has been unknown until this time at the concentration camps. The pictures she takes along with her fellow American Life magazine photojournalist, played by Andy Samberg, are some of the most impactful of the time. The movie delves deeper into censorship, protection of the public versus the need for the truth to be known far and wide. It also explores family, parents, being known and how one’s legacy can be shaped by one’s own view of your contribution. This is a remarkable life of someone who refused to do what was expected of her, and put herself at risk to journal what was happening in a troubled time. In 2024, we can talk about crisis after crisis and the “world never being the same again” but in the mid-1940s millions were being killed, and battles were taking place which shaped that world, and in this one. For those on the front lines, they lived day to day. As we enter into November and Remembrance Time, we should not forget the sacrifice made for the freedoms we hold dear, and will hopefully with some common sense, well into the future. I enjoyed this, and I especially enjoyed the ending and how it was presented.

Love is Blind – Season 7: The wedding show was dropped last week as the viewers learned how managed to get to the alter and commit to their partner, rather than walking away. Funnily enough, the one couple didn’t make it there as they had a break up with one deciding that he talked to family and friends and “just wasn’t sure”. Prior to that others had crashed and burned in more or less predictable fashion. I do believe that the premise itself is flawed. Falling in love and proposing not ever setting eyes on someone is one thing, but there are all the other real world impacts (financial, geographic, cultural and political issues) all have material impact on compatability.

For this season, there was some due diligence seemingly not undertaken by the producers. I would like to think that if a contestant has children, that this would be something that would be explored fully before they entered into such an experiment. I would further expect that if that was fully vetted, that there is a follow up to ensure that it is disclosed to those people that they are talking to. I would further expect that if a contestant for a show based in Washington DC is deeply committed to living in California that this also be disclosed up front. Better yet, why not have that contestant wait for another season in California be filmed and throw your name into the ring there. I think it is unfair to expect compromise where you are already living in DC, but later talk about looking to move. I was pleased to see that parents who throughout the process were against being involved and on camera decide that they wish to set aside their trepidation about the process and show up for a memorable day for their adult child. In any way, it would be a later regret in my view. The reunion show will be a spectacle (dropping this Wednesday) and should show the aftermath of the decisions made in this season. I didn’t enjoy this season as much as the previous LIB UK version, where the people involved seemed more genuine and committed to the process. This is mind candy for those who desire some escapism.