December 2, 2024

Gladiator II: A couple years back when I had heard rumours of a sequel being made by Ridley Scott for Gladiator, I had thought to myself, how can their be a sequel, Maximum (the Russell Crowe Gladiator) had been killed. It was a fitting ending to a good story, well told. I quibbled a bit with the CGI, especially of Rome and the Coliseum as it looked more from a video game than a Hollywood movie, but the film’s performances overshadowed some of the challenges. I was tempering my enthusiasm, as best as I try to do with highly anticipated movies like this one because in the back of my mind is that I don’t want to build it up in my head such that it cannot meet the expectations. I entered the theatre hoping for the best, thinking “I hope this doesn’t suck”.

Well sadly, this was not was I was hoping for at all. Did it suck? I wouldn’t go that far, but I would say that it is a story not worthy of the original, nor Ridley Scott. First of all, however much Russell Crowe is not “in” this movie, his image and finger prints are all over it. I hope that Crowe gets paid for his 2000 image being used so often. The only two original actors in this version is Derek Jacobi (as a senator) and Connie Nielson (who played Lucilla, the daughter of slain Emperor Marcus Aurilius).

My limited pre-screening knowledge was that this was a story about Lucius, the young son of Lucilla who had met Maximus when he was in Rome as a slave gladiator. Maximus’ last words were confirming that “Lucius is safe”. I honestly wished that I hadn’t heard even this little bit of information. It spoiled the earlier part of the movie. There are some heavy hitting acting talents on screen like Denzel Washington, Pedro Pascal (who is virtually everywhere) and Paul Mescal as Lucius. For me as someone who really likes the original Best Picture as well four other Oscars. But it misses. The plot comes across for me as contrived. I had always thought, “how does Lucius get all these mad fighting skills as a prince raised in the palace”? But it goes beyond that. In Rome, as opposed to the “vision of Rome” and it becoming a Republic once again with the people running it as opposed to an Emperor, it now has twin Emperors running the country. And these twins are as outlandish and cartoonish as you can imagine. Incidentally, there have never been twin brothers on the throne as Emperor. It just doesn’t make sense, and it wasn’t necessary. It makes the current General’s issue (played by Pascal) with the leadership plain. Then it goes further with a re-enactment in the Coliseum of a naval battle. It has full ships, including oars for the boats, along with many sharks swimming in the waters. I was told that naval battles were shown, however not with sharks nor water deep enough for oars. The final straw for me is the whole issue about details about Lucius which just make sense either for me. So while this movie never approached the original, it didn’t suck, but it didn’t really reveal any reason for being. It didn’t move the overall story much. So I cannot recommend this, and see it as a lost opportunity.

Say Nothing: I had heard about this series on Disney +, as it dealt with The Troubles in Ireland during that 1970s and beyond, and a number of the prominent figures in the Irish Republican Army. It is based upon the book by Patrick Radden Keefe unread by me. This nine-part series tells the true story about the Belfast Project at Boston College, where it had been arranged to have volunteers from the IRA tell their stories on the condition that these stories wouldn’t be disclosed until the person was dead. The aim was to have the whole truth come out for later generations of Northern Irish to explain the actions of Gerry Adams. You see, Adams denies ever being a part of the IRA, let alone being one the leaders in Belfast. There was leadership, like Adams, and there would foot soldiers like Brendan Hughes, Dolours and Marian Price. Adams had become one of the negotiators for a ceasefire in the 1980s with the British, as there was a truce which didn’t mean that the British occupying force was leaving the Emerald Island for good.

This series has a number of different storylines, focusing on the two sisters and their story and involvement with the IRA movement. The story evolves from a re-telling of events according to Dolours, the redhead picture above. I won’t share any more of the details because it is a fascinating story of very difficult and complex times. The issues have evolved over the centuries. I have been to Belfast a couple of times, including taking a black cab tour explaining some of the history within Belfast. It was very eye opening, and scary that in my lifetime, these events can have unfolded with bombings in London, hunger strikes, police brutality within a walled city. But now, progress can be seen as I can take a bus to Belfast and tour the Titanic Museum and have no fear about any difficulties. I am hopeful that the peace which is very controversial, especially among staunch Republic supporters (justifably was a sell-out allowing further British occupation) but on the other hand you have to start somewhere. I don’t have all the answers. Not even close. I don’t think that Gerry Adams has all the answers either, and he is a human without character to throw his supporters and one-time friends under the bus to seek glory for himself, but has he served the greater good of the people of Northern Ireland? Time will tell the answer on that. If you want more insight into the truth of what happened, this is a series for you to view. I highly recommend this. A couple of questions though on this: with the further tale of murder and mayhem within the IRA, who benefits most from this? If the aim remains to get the British out of Ireland, how can this be done in a peaceful way? One would think that if Germany can be reunified, and the Berlin wall can fall, that Ireland should be capable of being one island once again, and entitled to self-rule.

February 13th, 2023

Babylon: Damien Chazelle has brought forth this star-studded film with much fanfare and Oscar hype to tell a fictional story (loosely based on fact) regarding Hollywood as it transitions in the 1920s from silent films to talkies. Chazelle is known for films such as Whiplash, La La Land and First Man. As the film opens, there is an outrageous party taking place which the Margot Robbie character crashes. Attending would be the superstar actor of the time played by Brad Pitt.

There is a jazz band playing and Margot does her level best to make herself the centre of attention in the hopes of catching someone’s attention, since in her mind she is star material. She is successful as she gets a small part in a western cowboy movie where she steals the scene, set in a tavern. Told in much the same way as Tarantino’s Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, the story follows a number of the main characters including the black trumpet player of the jazz band at that party. I mention his race because there is a critical scene for him when he is working in a sound film as he is meant to build on the success of Al Jolson.

This movie is 3 hours and 9 mins long. It should be about two and a half. It becomes overly cumbersome in its own stories. There is a cameo by Tobey McGuire which could have been removed in its entirety. I am thankful that I didn’t watch this in a theatre,and pay good money for it. Is it a big screen film, in the same way that Top Gun Maverick or Avatar is? Absolutely not. The overall theme is the shifting of skills from silent films, where facial expression and physical abilities are paramount, versus in speaking films where the voice and delivering a line becomes the primary skill. So if you had an offensive speaking voice, you could get away with it in silent films. No more. Voice coaches, accents and delivering lines that had to be memorized is crucial. Yet despite this the stories which get recycled from silent films and show these new skills are very popular, just with different stars. Hollywood is a fickle place. One day you are at the top, then someone younger or prettier or eloquent arrives to take your place. Or the local Hollywood reporter picks up stories about you and writes about you to impact the overall perception about you. No matter what the era in Hollywood there will always be the allure of sex,drugs,alcohol, gambling and other vices. That is a constant. It impacts people in different ways, and the consequences are predictable. So is this movie. The stories are not really that unique. Even though these stories aren’t “real” they can be a composite of other people from the time like the Robbie character who has some similar traits as Clara Bow. The Oscar voters also were not impressed by this rather depressing tale. It garnered three nominations for Production Design, Score and Costume Design. No acting nods.

I will admit that I not a real Margot Robbie fan. The Aussie actress seems to play very similar roles as the somewhat wacky woman looks to her sex appeal to make up for a lot of ordinary traits in her. Apparently Emma Stone was considered for the role of Robbie and ended up turning it down. I shudder to think what Stone would have done with this, since she doesn’t have the looks of a Robbie (not in my mind anyway). But Chazelle used her in La La Land and maybe he wanted to continue the relationship. Overall I found this film to be an over indulgence with scenes that were too busy, bombarding the senses visually making it difficult to concentrate. There is too much excess. I am sure that this reflects the reality, but is disturbing as you can see someone self-destructing. I cannot recommend. There were some pretty pictures and scenes but just not worth the time invested.

Pleasure: This is a 2021 movie that I stumbled upon looking at the movies available on Crave. I had never heard of it before, which makes sense because it really isn’t a mainstream film with known actors. In many ways though it mirrors some of the themes in the better hyped Babylon. Much like the Margot Robbie character, Sofia Kappel plays a young Swedish woman, called Bella Cherry, looking to make her mark and become famous. She targets being a porn actress as opposed to mainstream silent films. But the approach is the same.

Bella has ambition and is determined to make something of herself, and will do virtually anything to become known. She takes criticisms and suggestions about her current state to heart and will, to her credit, act on them to move forward towards her goal. She wants to be the top porn actress. What were boundaries which she initially had, wash away in the desire to gain notoriety, followers on social media and becoming popular with those who have the power in that industry. She takes part in scenes that are uncomfortable to watch and I am certain to perform in. If the viewer has any illusions that this industry is about pleasure, the curtains will be pulled to the side and a clear window into it will be shown.

Much like Robbie, she sells her soul for the golden chalice. She had some friends that she lived with, a couple of who had some modest success in the business, she Bella wants more. To that end she will betray those around her to get ahead. Friendship be damned, her singular mission doesn’t have time to stop and be sympathetic. To her credit, Bella is take charge and doesn’t wait for others to create opportunities for her. Robbie the same. They both make things happen, and make the best of circumstances as they present themselves in the moment. For Bella, it can be attending a convention where she is just one of many “talent” on the floor and then making herself front and centre upstaging the better known star. The underlying theme is “be careful what you ask for, you might just get it”. In the same way that Tony Montana in Scarface wanted to be a King of the World, unbridled ambition can leave the soul crumbling, with no one there to be beside you to enjoy it. Despite the uncomfortable scenes, I think Kappel has a magnetism, with a presence on screen. We’ll see what else she can be doing in the future. No matter what the industry, whether main stream films, porn or any other, when one digs deeper into the power and people involved, you can have your eyes opened to the reality of it.

Gladiator 2: Alison shared this news item with me that I wanted to share. The title of course is a little surprising since in the original Gladiator the Russell Crowe character Maximus dies on the floor of the Coliseum, along with Caesar. But apparently, the 85yo Ridley Scott is looking to have a sequel to Gladiator telling the story of young Lucius, who was the son of Lucilla, the daughter of Marcus Aurelius

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/gladiator-sequel-release-date-ridley-scott-paul-mescal-1235512045/

The Aftersun actor Paul Mescal will play Lucius. The rest of the details are unknown except a release date scheduled for 2024. I am not sure how to feel about this. I like Gladiator, certainly the Hans Zimmer score was excellent, I hated the CGI especially of the Coliseum, but the story and Russell Crowe was really good. The film won Best Film and Best Actor for Crowe in 2001. Ridley Scott is also one of my favourite directors. So we will see what he can come up with. Like Clint Eastwood, he keeps cranking out movies and working. There is apparently no retirement age in Hollywood, and especially directors.